ROTARY NEPAL – RE-CENTERING ETHICS 2026

From Values to Action: Building an Ethical Nepal

Suggested period: 1–31 October 2026
Key day: Global Ethics Day — 21 October 2026
Lead: Rotary districts/clubs in Nepal, with Rotaract and Interact

This program connects to Rotary’s Four-Way Test

This is where the programme can become uniquely Rotary, rather than simply another ethics conference.

The classic Rotary questions can be applied to the ethics of care:

Is it the truth?

Are we honest about the suffering of vulnerable people?

Is it fair to all concerned?

Does our decision consider the weakest person—not just the most powerful?

Will it build goodwill and better friendships?

Does our behaviour strengthen trust?

Will it be beneficial to all concerned?

Does our solution actually improve people’s lives?

Nepal’s Rotary community has already used Global Ethics Day as a platform around ethics, integrity and the Four-Way Test. The 2025 national symposium in Nepal also involved youth, professional communities, civil society and others, and included efforts such as translating the Four-Way Test into multiple languages.  

So “Ethics of Care” can become a natural evolution rather than a departure from Rotary’s existing ethics work.

 

The campaign could have six interconnected themes:

  1. Ethical Leadership
  2. AI, Technology & Digital Ethics
  3. Integrity and Anti-Corruption
  4. Mental Health & Compassion
  5. Ethics in Education and Professional Life
  6. Intergenerational Values & Responsible Citizenship

 

On 21 October 2026 (Global Ethics Day), Rotary Nepal invites you to "Re-Centering Ethics: The Ethics of Care." This special session brings seven distinct voices—from youth activists to senior citizens and caregivers—together to answer one vital question:

“What is one thing society could do differently that would make vulnerable people feel more respected and less alone?”

During this event, we will highlight on setting a practical standard for community support, mental health advocacy, and caregiver relief. Your proposed “Re-Centering Ethics: The Ethics of Care” is a particularly strong way to translate the global 2026 theme into a Nepal-specific Rotary programme. The official 2026 Global Ethics Day theme is “Re-centering Ethics,” and Global Ethics Day will be observed on Wednesday, 21 October 2026. Carnegie Council describes the day as an opportunity to make ethics an active part of personal, professional and public life—not merely an academic subject.  

  •  

1. Why “The Ethics of Care” is powerful

The central idea could be:

Ethics is not only about knowing what is right. It is about how we treat people—especially when they are vulnerable, dependent, invisible or unable to speak for themselves.

This moves the discussion of ethics beyond corruption, rules, compliance and professional codes.

A society can have excellent laws and still be deeply unethical if:

  • elderly people are neglected;
  • caregivers are exploited or ignored;
  • people with mental-health problems are stigmatized;
  • children are abused or humiliated;
  • women are denied dignity;
  • persons with disabilities are excluded;
  • poor people are treated as less worthy;
  • patients are treated merely as “cases”;
  • technology is designed without considering vulnerable users;
  • young people are denied a voice;
  • corruption becomes normalized.

The ethics of care asks a different question:

“How does our behaviour affect the dignity, wellbeing and humanity of another person?”

 

2. The seven voices

Bringing seven different voices together is excellent because it prevents ethics from becoming a conversation among only senior professionals and policymakers specifically proposing voices ranging from youth activists to senior citizens and caregivers.  

I would structure the seven voices as follows:

Voice 1 — The Young Person

Question:
What kind of society do young people want to inherit?

Topics:

  • honesty versus success at any cost;
  • academic pressure;
  • social-media ethics;
  • cyberbullying;
  • AI-generated misinformation;
  • corruption becoming “normal”;
  • opportunities for young people to participate in decision-making.

The young person should not merely be treated as a beneficiary. Young people should be recognized as ethical actors and decision-makers.

 

Voice 2 — The Caregiver

Question:
Who cares for the person who cares for everyone else? This could become one of the most emotionally powerful parts of the programme. Family caregivers often provide enormous amounts of unpaid emotional and physical labour. Yet society may simply assume:

“It is their responsibility.”

The ethics of care says that caregiving is a social responsibility, not merely a private family burden.

Discuss:

  • caregiver burnout;
  • emotional exhaustion;
  • financial pressure;
  • lack of respite care;
  • mental-health support;
  • exploitation by institutions;
  • dignity of caregivers;
  • recognition of unpaid care work.

 

Voice 3 — The Senior Citizen

Question:
What does an ethical society owe its older generation? This should go beyond pensions and healthcare.

Ask:

  • Are older people listened to?
  • Are they included in decisions?
  • Do they have meaningful social roles?
  • Are they respected when they become dependent?
  • Do we confuse ageing with uselessness?
  • Are families becoming too busy to care?
  • How can technology help rather than isolate older people?

A powerful principle could be:

“Age should never reduce a person’s dignity.”

 

Voice 4 — The Person Living with Mental-Health Challenges

Question:
What would dignity look like if society stopped judging people for their suffering?

This brings mental health directly into ethics.

Ethical care requires: compassion + confidentiality + informed consent + respect + accessibility + non-discrimination.

It also raises uncomfortable questions about:

  • stigma;
  • coercion;
  • unethical treatment;
  • exploitation of vulnerable families;
  • confidentiality;
  • commercialization of suffering;
  • lack of affordable mental-health services.

Mental illness is not a moral failure, and asking for help is not weakness.

Voice 5 — The Person with Disability or Other Vulnerability

Question:
Are we designing society with vulnerable people—or merely designing society for them?

“What can we do for them?”

“How can we design systems in which they have agency, choice and participation?”

This connects ethics with universal design, accessibility, transportation, education, employment and digital inclusion.

Voice 6 — The Professional / Doctor / Teacher / Engineer / Businessperson

Question:
What happens when professional success conflicts with ethical responsibility? This can connect directly with Rotary’s professional-service tradition.

Examples:

  • A doctor facing commercial pressure.
  • An engineer asked to approve unsafe work.
  • A teacher pressured to manipulate results.
  • A businessperson facing a bribery demand.
  • A civil servant confronting political pressure.
  • An engineer or technology professional developing an AI system that could harm people.

“What will you do when doing the right thing costs you something?”

 

Voice 7 — The Community / Ethical Leader

Question:
What kind of leadership can rebuild trust? Leadership should not simply be defined by position.

An ethical leader:

  • accepts responsibility;
  • tells the truth;
  • admits mistakes;
  • listens;
  • protects vulnerable people;
  • does not abuse power;
  • does not demand privileges;
  • treats public resources as public trust;
  • thinks beyond the next election, promotion or profit.

This connects strongly with broader Ethical Leadership theme.

Three follow-up questions:

1. What is happening now? Where are we failing?

2. What should change? What would ethical care look like?

3. What will you personally do? What is one action you are willing to take?

That last question prevents the programme from becoming another discussion where everyone agrees but nothing changes.

We commit to:

  1. Respect every person’s dignity, regardless of age, gender, disability, economic status or social position.
  2. Listen before judging, particularly when someone is vulnerable or distressed.
  3. Protect those who cannot easily protect themselves.
  4. Recognize caregivers and promote their wellbeing and respite.
  5. Treat mental health as part of health, not as a source of shame.
  6. Give young people a meaningful voice in decisions affecting their future.
  7. Respect older people as contributors, not merely recipients of care.
  8. Use technology and AI responsibly, with human dignity, privacy, fairness and accountability at the centre.
  9. Reject corruption and conflicts of interest, even when unethical behaviour appears convenient or socially accepted.
  10. Turn compassion into action through measurable community initiatives.

 

“We will not merely speak about ethics. We will practice it.” Bring AI ethics into the conversation

 

“When technology makes decisions about people, who protects the human being behind the data?”

Discuss:

  • AI bias;
  • privacy;
  • misinformation;
  • deepfakes;
  • algorithmic discrimination;
  • surveillance;
  • digital exclusion of older people;
  • AI in healthcare;
  • AI in education;
  • children’s safety online.

 

Technology must serve humanity—not reduce humanity to data.

 

 

“What must we change before it becomes too late?”

Ask every participating Rotary club to make one concrete commitment.

For example:

  • one caregiver-support programme;
  • one mental-health awareness programme;
  • one senior-citizen initiative;
  • one youth ethics workshop;
  • one AI ethics awareness session;
  • one anti-corruption/community-integrity activity;
  • one intergenerational programme.